On the Order of the Day being read for the adjourned debate on the question - That the Controlled Substances (Palliative Use of Cannabis) Amendment Bill be now read a second time: ????????????????

Social Development Committee of the Parliament of South Australia 19 4.2 POSSIBLE MODELS FOR LEGISLATIVE CHANGE The models described below are drawn from the report of the National Drug Strategy’s Committee that investigated legislative options for the use of cannabis in Australia.

This higher number is in part due to a higher number of audits conducted with the SA Police at illegal cannabis operations.

Issues such as medicinal cannabis and vaping cut across regulatory areas and we have been working with the Therapeutic Goods Administration to develop cross- regulatory solutions.

Controlled Substances Act 1984 - Cannabis Offences. ?????????????????????????

(including cannabis incident expiation notices reports issued) Complaints against the police 1985/86 6 555 1 160 8 1986/87 7 797 1 213 7 1987/88 7 103 603 10 1988/89 6 509 989 14 1989/90 n/a 945 22 Allegations are one thing; whether those allegations are or can be substantiated by investigation is quite another.

Supports the separation of the cannabis market from the market of other illegal drugs; and ???????

Controlled Substances Act Significant changes were made to this Act making simple cannabis offences (those relating to personal use of cannabis and cannabis resin) the subject of on- the -spot fines under some circumstances.

Notes t he February 2016 passage of the federal Narcotic Drugs Amendment Bill 2016 enabling a national licensing scheme for the controlled cultivation across Australia of cannabis for medicinal and scientific purposes ; II.